(1) As cure the buyer may, at their choice, demand that the defect be remedied or that a thing free of defects be supplied.
(2) The seller is to bear all expenses required for the purpose of cure, in particular transport, workers’ travel, work and materials costs.
(3) Where the buyer has installed the defective thing, in keeping with its nature and its purpose, into some other thing or has attached it to some other thing before the defect became apparent, the seller is obliged, in the context of curing the defect, to reimburse the buyer for the expenses required for removing the defective thing and installing or attaching the repaired thing, or the thing free of defects that has been delivered.
(4) Without prejudice to section 275 subsections (2) and (3), the seller may refuse to provide the type of cure chosen by the buyer if this cure is possible only at disproportionate expense. In this connection, account is to be taken in particular of the value of the thing when free of defects, the significance of the defect and the question as to whether recourse could be had to the alternative type of cure without substantial detriment to the buyer. The claim of the buyer in this case is restricted to the alternative type of cure; the right of the seller to refuse the alternative type of cure as well, subject to the prerequisites set out in sentence 1, remains unaffected.
(5) The buyer is to make available the thing to the seller for the purpose of cure.
(6) Where the seller supplies a thing free of defects for the purpose of cure, the seller may demand the return of the defective thing in accordance with sections 346 to 348. The seller is to take back, at its cost, the thing that has been replaced.