(1) The custodianship court is to remove the custodian if their suitability to attend to the affairs of the person under custodianship is no longer guaranteed or there is another compelling reason for the removal. A compelling reason also exists if the custodian has intentionally issued an incorrect statement of costs or has not maintained the necessary personal contact with the person under custodianship. As a rule, the court is to remove the custodian appointed under section 1897 (6) if the person under custodianship can be cared for by one or more than one other persons outside the exercise of an occupation or profession.
(2) The custodian may demand to be removed if, following their appointment, circumstances arise on the basis of which they no longer reasonably can be expected to conduct the custodianship.
(3) The court may remove the custodian if the person under custodianship suggests an equally suitable person who is prepared to assume the custodianship.
(4) The association custodian also is to be removed if the association applies for this. If the removal is not necessary for the well-being of the person under custodianship, the custodianship court may instead declare, with the agreement of the custodian, that the custodian will continue the custodianship in future as a private person. Sentences 1 and 2 apply accordingly for the public authority custodian.
(5) The association or the public authority is to be removed as soon as the person under custodianship can be adequately cared for by one or more than one natural persons.