(1) At the request of an insolvency creditor, the insolvency court retracts the grant of discharge of residual debt if
1. it is subsequently found that the debtor has infringed one of his or her obligations by wanton act and thereby impaired the satisfaction of the insolvency creditors to a considerable extent,
2. it is subsequently found that the debtor was sentenced during the assignment period in accordance with section 297 (1) or if the debtor was not sentenced until after the grant of discharge of residual debt for an offence committed before the end of the assignment period in accordance with section 297 (1) or
3. the debtor has wantonly or gross negligently contravened disclosure or cooperation requirements after the grant of discharge of residual debt which are incumbent on the debtor under this Code during the insolvency proceedings.
(2) Such request by a creditor is admissible only if it is filed within one year after the decision on granting discharge of residual debt becomes final; a retraction pursuant to subsection (1), no. 3 may be requested up to six months following final termination of the insolvency proceedings. The creditor is required to show to the satisfaction of the court that the conditions for the ground for retraction are met. In the cases referred to in subsection (1) no. 1, the creditor is, in addition, to show to the satisfaction of the court that he or she was not aware of the ground for retraction before the decision of the court became final.
(3) The debtor and, in the cases referred to in subsection (1) no. 1 and 3, the trustee or the insolvency administrator are also to be heard prior to the decision. The requesting party and the debtor may bring immediate appeal against such decision. The decision retracting discharge of residual debt is to be published.